The controversy surrounding ANWR is whether to drill or not to drill into the area. Some people want. Idea of Drilling for Oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Throughout American history, there have been a number of conflicts and disagreements among the populace over various issues. These conflicts of interest help to define political parties and allow people to distinguish themselves through party allegiance. One such item that is currently being debated is over the idea of drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
For years, environmentalist groups and oil industry. Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge Everyday we put tons of pollution into the air, water and ground. Our population is growing each day and in turn urbanization is expanding. Teddy Roosevelt, being an avid outdoorsmen, knew the importance of setting land aside for posterity sake and in doing do set a trend for later presidents.
Essay Opponents to Drilling in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge | Cram
What I began to wonder after reading the article is, if we humans should continue our scientific and technological petroleum endeavors even though we are causing. The Arctic Refuge has long been recognized as an unparalleled place of natural beauty and ecological importance. The Arctic Refuge was established to conserve. ANWR is home to numerous species of wildlife and one of the largest untapped oil preserves in the United States. There is an immense debate between the opposing environmentalists and the politicians who want to drill for oil on a section of ANWR, which is only 1.
Environmentalists who oppose drilling for oil in Alaska say the wildlife and the native. The five categories included in the process are. To Drill or Not to Drill is a multidisciplinary problem based learning exercise, which intends to increase students' knowledge of a variety of topics through a real world environmental topic. In addition, drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge ANWR impacts students either directly depending on the age level or indirectly through their parents as gas prices soar to record high levels.
The students will consider the economics and policy decisions that come with hot political issues. The students will understand the personal and social perspectives of drilling in a pristine environment. Secondary goal up to teacher : The student will examine the Arctic's role in global climate change and how drilling in the Arctic could impact the climate on a global scale.
Republish this article
Over a period of three classroom sessions, the students will research the topics within their group, answering questions from the Secretary of the Interior, turn in a position paper with their research, and prepare and deliver an opening statement to the class.
Students debate the issue, in a formal style debate, and the student Arbitrators present relayed information from the perspectives of the Trust and Balance Doctrines. The students make a recommendation to the Secretary of the Department of the Interior. Teaching materials: Online drilling videos from both a pro and con perspective Letter from the Department of Interior: There are several key stakeholders with this issue, including Petroleum Companies, Environmentalists, Alaska Natives, the State and US Governments, the American population, and Arbitrators.
Each letter contains key criteria and questions to be considered in this activity, as well as a list of potential resources. List of potential resources e. Lieberman, B. Energy and Environment. Arctic Power. Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Carlisle, J. Knight, P. There is No Question. National Resources Defense Council. Arctic Wildlife Refuge.
Essay: The (Long) Story of ANWR
Alaska Wilderness League. Sierra Club. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. McGrath, S. The Last Great Wilderness. Arnold, E. National Public Radio Broadcast. Nageak, B. This resulted in tragic consequences and also resulted in the loss of Indigenous presence in the ancestral land Hersher, Harmsen.
Video: The Importance of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
Oil drilling in the Arctic might provide financial support to fund the villages and make it possible for the villagers to stay Dale. The two basic issues that need to be addressed by policy are the issue of identity and the issue of economic security of Indigenous youths Trout 7, Dale. The individual and cultural identity of Indigenous youths is tied to the land of their ancestors and could probably benefit from preservation of the ANWR Dale.
They would also benefit from policies that protect their cultural and political autonomy. The issue of economic survival might be solved by participating in the oil industry Dale , , Oil exploration in the ANWR might satisfy the economic needs of Indigenous Arctic youths and make it possible for them to assimilate within the global economy and lifestyle Blum, Dale Public policy should aim to foster the identity, autonomy and financial security of Indigenous youths without harming their habitat.
It should promote autonomous choices of lifestyle and meaningful employment. It should also help the youths to develop their identity as autonomous members of Indigenous culture and autonomous members of the global community.
Policy development should require participation of Indigenous youths. Maintaining small villages in the Arctic with 21 st century standards of living, including education, social welfare and healthcare is extremely costly on a per person basis Dale. However, there is an enormous social and environmental reward in maintaining a pristine landscape together with its ancestral caretakers Bourne, Huffman. The total cost to the global community is minimal.
Fortunately, the Indigenous people of the Alaskan Arctic also have access to natural resources Dale. The question from the national perspective is whether the funds should come from oil drilling in the Arctic region of the ANWR, from drilling elsewhere in Alaska Dale or the United States, or from other sources.
National policy should aim to find a compromise that will provide for the identity and financial needs of the Indigenous people and also protect their ancestral habitat and the ANWR. Policy plans should also include the voice of the Indigenous Arctic inhabitants around the Globe. Policy could try to develop Indigenous land resources in non-protected areas and distribute the financial rewards to all Indigenous Arctic areas.
Another option is to use profits from the oil industry in other areas of the USA or from other areas of Alaska in order to protect the ANWR and to support economic infrastructure of the Indigenous people. Another alternative is to exact a global price for protection of wildlife refuges and to protect the arctic. Allen, James, Stacy Rasmus, M.
Fok, Carlotta Charles, and Ching Henry. Department of the Interior, 24 Aug. Blum, Justin. Bourne, Joel K. Chance, Norman.
Comay, Laura B. Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service, Issuing Body.
The ANWR Debate
Congressional Research Service, Dale, Veland, and Hansen. Dinero, Steven. Eder, Steve, and Henry Fountain. Hamilton, Lawrence C. Hersher, Rebecca.
Related drilling arctic national wildlife refuge essay
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved